Is this term familiar to anyone? If you're a trekkie it will be. The Prime Directive is the foremost law that Star Fleet is governed by. As they explore strange new worlds and encounter other civilizations and life forms, the Prime Directive prevents certain actions, minimizing interference. Although Star Fleet is a peaceful organization, one of science and discovery, they are committed to allowing cultures to develop on their own and will not interfere with the natural course of a civilization, planet or habitat.
This is a very sound law. They seek life and value all of it, but will not interfere with its development or destruction, because the path of learning and growing without outside influence is how civilizations progress.
If we were to apply this to our world in our time (2010, not 2374) do those nations with more technology and understanding have a place to interfere with those who have less? Take for example the US military involving themselves in the civil disputes of Africa and the Middle East. There is genocide and our perception of inappropriate behaviour toward women. They have grown and developed separate from us and have cultivated different values and beliefs.
We cherish the value of a human life and hate to see captivity and injustice. But our interference will change the course of their development, and it may not be in good favour.
Food for thought: should we be where we are not wanted, enforcing the values we've come by on our own onto others, changing the evolutionary course of their learning and development? Or do we allow a seemingly barbaric nation to continue on its path as we stand and watch, waiting for the plea of help where we are welcome and they are ready?
What a provocative post - I tend to believe we should wait until 'we' are asked for help - allow them to evolve as we have - not the same - but evolve in their own way that works best for them - we may not agree with their evolution - but that is not up to us. It needs to be what is best for 'them' not 'us'.
ReplyDelete